W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > May 2012

AW: Shall we shelve Level Zero?

From: Fritz, Kay, VF-DE <Kay.Fritz@vodafone.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 19:15:06 +0200
Message-ID: <0B1FD1F2439FB846A6BE4020881C040A034F0FE6@VF-MBX17.internal.vodafone.com>
To: "Jet Villegas" <jet@mozilla.com>, <public-coremob@w3.org>
I agree with Jet - I would prefer that all tests are run no matter how the results are.

Kind regards
Kay Fritz 
 
Vodafone Test & Innovation Center
____________________________________________
 
Phone: +49 (0) 211 533 6571   (Fax: - 6875) 
Mobile: +49 (0) 172 1670943
EMail:  Kay.Fritz@vodafone.com
___________________________________________________ 
Die gesetzlichen Pflichtangaben finden Sie unter www.vodafone.de/pflichtangaben


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jet Villegas [mailto:jet@mozilla.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2012 00:55
An: public-coremob@w3.org
Betreff: Re: Shall we shelve Level Zero?

I would prefer that the rings represent features like ring 0 == text, ring 1 == images, ring 2 == JavaScript, ring 3 == audio, ring 4 == video...

I also don't think that failing an inner ring should halt testing on outer rings. The web developer should be able to see the level of compatibility across several rings at once. For example, if a developer is trying to build an app that needs a ring 997 feature (let's say 'teleportation') they should be able to see if that works even if the browser has a bug with vertical Hiragana text in ring 42. 

I also think we should grade the compatibility (not binary gray/green.) 

-- Jet

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Grigsby" <jason@cloudfour.com>
To: "jeanfrancois moy" <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>
Cc: tobie@fb.com, robin@berjon.com, public-coremob@w3.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 2:33:55 PM
Subject: Re: Shall we shelve Level Zero?

On May 2, 2012, at 10:21 AM, <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com> wrote:

> I don't agree with using the level 0 as a target. To define following 
> levels, we need a base and that is the purpose of the level 0; It acts 
> as a starting line for the rest of this community group work.

I'm sorry. I don't mean to be dense, but why is a base necessary? Without it, what won't the group be able to work on?

-Jason
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 17:15:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:46 UTC