W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Rough first draft of Level 0

From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 23:01:51 +0100
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "<jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>" <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2A2B5678-7242-417C-9DFD-979BE0BD197A@gmail.com>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>

On 29 Mar 2012, at 22:35, Tobie Langel wrote:

> On 3/29/12 11:22 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
> 
>> Having said that, it might be quicker to just define an alternative JSON
>> serialisation of the Widget's XML format. That's currently the domain of
>> the Native Web Apps community group [1] (as chair of the CG, and editor
>> of the Widget specs, happy to help!), as WebApps membership generally
>> finds the widget work toxic so don't expect any support there (though
>> ironically all browser vendors ship a widget/browser-extension platform
>> of one sort or another).
> 
> There expressed interest by Mozilla and Opera to tackle this issue. Let's
> see how it goes.

Or just publish Rich's thing as a Note and have done. Its not exactly rocket science.

I doubt anyone in practice would want to write a config.json file for their app, but I don't think we're dealing with practical concerns here.

> 
> --tobie
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 22:02:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:46 UTC