W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > July 2012

RE: Are Level 0 features included in Level 1 Spec?

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 22:43:21 +0000
To: Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
CC: Core Mobile <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C350FF5A03D@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>

AT&T would like to support the definition of Level 0 and step up as editor of the spec. We believe that this baseline is very important and needs to be supported in the overall CoreMob program including test assets. Our developer program team has the resources to support this effort, and is looking forward to getting more directly involved in W3C work in support of developers and mobile web user agent compliance.

Given that we provide the needed editing support, I would like to get confirmation that there is support in general for continuing this work in CoreMob.

Bryan Sullivan

From: Jo Rabin [mailto:jo@linguafranca.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 9:16 AM
To: Tobie Langel
Cc: Core Mobile
Subject: Re: Are Level 0 features included in Level 1 Spec?

On 18 Jul 2012, at 14:15, Tobie Langel wrote:

Hi Sun,

On 7/10/12 5:16 PM, "Sun, Dan" <Dan.Sun@VerizonWireless.com<mailto:Dan.Sun@VerizonWireless.com>> wrote:

Hi Tobie/Robin/Jo/All,

Level 0 was touched a little bit in the first F2F but no clear direction.

Think there's a clear direction. L0 is shelved. Unshelving it will require
providing a new spec editor for it and getting group consensus to do so.
So far, no editor has volunteered.

I think the F2F meeting determined that there is still interest in level 0 - at least that is the way I have written the meeting summary and the way that my response to my ACTION-2 [1]  reads. I completely hear your point that without an editor stepping forward it will be difficult to progress.

I'm sorry that these have not appeared sooner - they are coming to this list very shortly.


[1] http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/track/actions/2
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2012 22:44:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:47 UTC