- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:19:06 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: public-coremob@w3.org
On Thursday, 12 April 2012 at 14:33, Robin Berjon wrote: > Well, it seems that despite knowing these things we still don't have alignment. Maybe there genuinely is a problem? yes, we keep starting with darn specs :) The RingMark test suite is the spec already, so do we really need another W3C document? > Could the problem be at least in part that people involved in these efforts prefer to provide all manner of philosophical high level metaphysical arguments over actually producing concrete change proposals? Maybe if we dug into the details instead of just talking about them we'd find things that some of us don't know about? I think we were on the right track with all the initial talk of doing it differently. Lets try the top-100 apps thing! That actually requires work and gets past all the bla bla. We know Angry Birds has been done, and the experience has been documented… so has Cut The Rope. I'm sure there are others. We have a lot of development houses here on the list. I'm sure they can provide direct feedback.
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 22:19:39 UTC