- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:33:28 -0800
- To: Makoto Ueki <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:21 AM, <makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote: > > Name: Makoto Ueki > Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com > Affiliation: Infoaxia, Inc. > Document: W2 > Item Number: Success Criterion 1.2.1 > Part of Item: > Comment Type: question > Summary of Issue: Video-only > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > Definition of "video-only" reads: > > video-only > > a time-based presentation that contains only video (no audio and no interaction) > > > > Are Flash movies which include links/buttons "video-only" media? > > > > Examples: > > http://www.adobe.com/ > > http://www.fujitsu.com/global/ > > > > My understanding is that it is not video-only media because it includes "interaction(link/button)". > > > > If it doesn't include any links/buttons, then it would be "video-only" media. And it also have to meet SC 1.2.1 if it is not pure decoration. > > Proposed Change: > Just to confirm. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ We are interpreting your question about such a flash movie as a question about flash content that contains only buttons and not video. If the flash content in your example contains only buttons and the presentation of those buttons or the or user's ability to interact with them are not time-sensitive, then the flash content would not be video-only because it is not a "time-based presentation." Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 20 November 2009 23:34:07 UTC