W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > February 2019

Re: WCAG 2.2 survey

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:43:39 +0200
To: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: "COGA TF" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1690a11496f.e9f2573b367727.7042846986549614943@zoho.com>
my problem is with accepting the https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.2_Success_criterion_acceptance_requirements

 that is part of this proposal



it seems to me unreasonable and resistant to dealing with change- things  like :

Be feasibly testable through automated or manual processes, i.e. take a few minutes per page with current tools.


IE if a new tool is needed  it is rejected!



- even if making a new tool or change to a tool would take a day of a good programmers time!



This is the 
All the best



Lisa Seeman



http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/, https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa








---- On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:45:53 +0200 Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote ----




Hi everyone,

 

I just wanted to point out the WCAG 2.2 survey this week:
 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG22_yesno/ 
 

We’re looking for a decision on whether to do a WCAG 2.2 before CSUN so that we can proceed with the charter and get things going, or not. The survey is this week, if that is positive there will be a CFC just  before CSUN.

 

If it goes ahead, we’d be looking for some people from the COGA TF to work on the potential SCs with other members of the AGWG in a small group or groups. That would be in the March-April-May timeframe.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. If there are aspects to the decision you’d like everyone to consider, then the survey is a good place to put them.

 

Cheers,

 

-Alastair

 

--

 

http://www.nomensa.com/ / @alastc

 

 
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2019 08:44:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 20 February 2019 08:44:16 UTC