Re: Teams for WCAG 2.2 Proposed Coga Success Criteria

I may have become confused John.

While WCAG and Michael mentioned an item called "Accessible 
Authentication" in the meeting, there is no such pattern in the Design 
Guide.

There is "Logging in does not rely on good memory or other cognitive 
skills" an I assumed that is the one that was intended so used that name 
in my email.

Did I get that wrong?

In addition, as we have another pattern called "Do not rely on users 
memorizing information" I removed "good memory or" from the log in 
pattern to avoid the obvious overlap. We are waiting for Jamie to 
complete this pattern.

Did I get that wrong?

Thanks


On 23/04/2019 19:29, Rochford, John wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> I notice Accessible Authentication is not on the list. Why?
> 
> John
> 
> John Rochford <http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
> University of Massachusetts Medical School
> 
> Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
> Director, INDEX Program
> Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
> www.DisabilityInfo.org
> 
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-rochford/>
> 
> /_Confidentiality Notice:_//__/
> 
> /This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of 
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and 
> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or 
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete 
> all copies of the original message./
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 10:52 AM
> To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> Subject: Teams for WCAG 2.2 Proposed Coga Success Criteria
> 
> Information on people working on new WCGA 2.2 Success Criteria (SCs) as 
> agreed in the last week's AGWG meeting.
> 
> At our recent Face to Face meeting in Southampton we selected four 
> Design Patterns that we want to become SCs in the next release of WCGA 2.2.
> 
> In last weeks AGWG meeting each of these SCs was assigned a person from 
> the Coga TF. In addition others from WCAG joined to complete the teams.
> 
> One person is the lead and others will help out as they can.
> 
> The teams will work to give the SCs the best chance of making it into 
> WCAG 2.2 by using their combined experience of Coga and the WCAG SC process.
> 
> Here are the SCs and the teams
> 
> # Logging in does not rely on cognitive skills
> 
> Lead: Rachael Montgomery
> 
> Team: Alastair Campbell, Andrew Kirkpatrick, John Foliot
> 
> # Easy to find most important thing on a page
> 
> Lead: Rachael Montgomery
> 
> Team: Andrew Kirkpatrick
> 
> # Do not rely on users memorizing information
> 
> Lead: Rachael Montgomery
> 
> Team: Jake Abma, Andrew Kirkpatrick, JoAnne Juett
> 
> # Make it easy to undo errors
> 
> Lead: John Kirkwood
> 
> Team: Jake Abma, Andrew Kirkpatrick, Rachael Montgomery
> 
> I intend to lurk on each.
> 
> It would be good to have more people involved. So, if one particularly 
> interests you you can let the lead know, reply on this list or let 
> Michael know as he is usually on our Coga calls.
> 
> More details will appear as the teams start their work.
> 
> Steve
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2019 19:16:01 UTC