W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > July 2018

resolution - publish the appendix as a separate document

From: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:51:20 +0300
To: "\"Rochford, John\"" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>
Cc: "\"'Glenda Sims'\"" <glenda.sims@deque.com>, "\"EA Draffan\"" <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "\"public-cognitive-a11y-tf\"" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1648e89e6c0.f69ae10c62527.1169412172126442812@zoho.com>
As we had only positive responses we have resolved to publish the appendix as a separate document All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:50:03 +0300 Rochford, John <john.rochford@umassmed.edu> wrote ---- +1 to Appendix as a separate document.   From: Glenda Sims [mailto:glenda.sims@deque.com] Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 12:18 PM To: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Cc: lisa.seeman@zoho.com; public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: Re: Call For Consensus. publish the appendix as a separate document   +1   I support the Appendix being a separate document.     G glenda sims, cpacc   | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773            deque systems  accessibility for good   On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:44 PM, EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: +1   I agree that it should be a separate document.  As an Appendix it is so large, although I hope this does not mean it gets lost in the mound of documents that seem to be around.   Best wishes E.A.   Mrs E.A. Draffan WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103 http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk UK AAATE rep http://www.aaate.net/   From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] Sent: 03 July 2018 17:02 To: "public-cognitive-a11y-tf" <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: Call For Consensus. publish the appendix as a separate document   Hi Folks   Call For Consensus (CFC) — ends Sunday 8th of July  at 12:00 noon Boston time  (A bit longer the usual becuse of the holiday)   We would like the appendix on how to make content usable for people with leaning and cognitive disabilities of the gap analysis to be published as a separate document.   We discussed  this in last weeks call as part of the effort to make it easier for people to find the content that they need.   The section on how to make content usable for people with leaning and cognitive disabilities is for content developers. However, the rest of the gap analysis is mainly for people inside the W3C to understand what needs to happen in the W3C standards world. That content is harder for content developers to understand. Having advice for them at the end of advice for working groups inside the W3C is confusing.   Note that silence (non votes) will be understood as agreement.   Thanks and ... All the best   Lisa Seeman   LinkedIn, Twitter   All the best   Lisa Seeman   LinkedIn, Twitter        
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2018 12:51:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 12 July 2018 12:51:53 UTC