W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2016

RE: CFC - comments must be dated

From: Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:15:05 +0000
To: lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <bc0a4ec1af52492fa303e683a7a84dcd@E15MADAG-D05N03.sh11.lan>
Two questions:


-          The Google docs document already contains comments that I believe I made before consensus. I don't see how it is possible to go back and date these as I have no idea exactly when the comments were made.

-          When you say "tagged" "after consensus", I'd like to know if there is a Google docs tagging capability that we should be using or whether just putting "After consensus" in bold text in square brackets as I have been doing is OK?

Best regards

Mike

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: 15 November 2016 08:35
To: public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - comments must be dated

We agreed on the call yesterday that any comments added after the consensis persion is over will be marked as "after consensis",  so that we can track the urgency of comments in google docs (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DHoA9fQRsNtfrhxpf-HGVzbNpe6KUxv-cgxY6NM4mGI/edit#heading=h.aokeq5fss9ck)

I would like to change that so that all comments are either dated  or tagged "after consensus".  Otherwise  people forget the "after consensus" comment and it is much harder to  track the comments.
When the date is lacking it will be assumed to be "after consensus"

Please respond within 48 hours (17/11/2016 by 10.45 IST). A lack of response will be considered consent.


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter<https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>

________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 09:15:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 November 2016 09:15:53 UTC