W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > September 2006

Re: link activation material in CDR

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:15:50 +0200
To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, public-cdf@w3.org
Cc: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tfszoon664w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:19:20 +0200, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>  
wrote:
> We wonder if you have had any thoughts about this question, that you can  
> share with us graphics people?

The reason it was removed, iirc, was that it was specific to HTML and SVG  
and not at all generic as the framework should be.


> At 03:54 PM 7/20/2006 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>
>> Hello public-cdf,
>>
>> Looking at "Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0" (LCWD of Dec.  
>> 2005), the WebCGM WG found the section [1] on linking and child  
>> documents to contain particularly interesting and valuable informative  
>> material.
>>
>> [1]  
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051219/#link-activation-child-documents
>>
>> We noticed, in the current editors draft [2] (June 2006), that this  
>> material is missing.  (In fact, sections 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 are missing.)
>>
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/CDF/specs/CDR/wp-1/cdf.xhtml
>>
>> We are wondering if this is an intentional removal, or rather whether  
>> maybe this is just a transient development stage of the document that  
>> we're seeing?
>>
>> (Not speaking for SVG ... but as a participant of the SVG WG, I would  
>> voice the same opinion -- valuable material -- because these  
>> link-target details have progressed alternately and together in the two  
>> specifications, WebCGM and SVG.)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Lofton Henderson
>> (Chair WebCGM WG)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 06:47:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:41 GMT