W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-canvas-api@w3.org > October to December 2014

canvas, TPAC, and CR testing

From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:20:59 -0500
To: "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: "Mark Sadecki" <mark@w3.org>, Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, "Jay Munro" <jaymunro@microsoft.com>, "HTML Accessibility Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF2DB4BFEB.8CB25233-ON86257D78.0058E976-86257D78.0059CFF0@us.ibm.com>


Sam,

At the last meeting we dicussed meeting times on Canvas at the face to
face. This is proving to be problematic:

1. SVG, HTML, and PF all meet on the same 2 days at the face to face
meeting
2. I am a member of all 3 working groups
3. PF has scheduled my time in group sessions with HTML, SVG, Digital
Publishing, and CSS as well as ARIA.next the last day.

I don't have any control over the scheduling of TPAC but since we never got
around to scheduling exact times for things like Canvas until now I don't
see any bandwidth for participating in an canvas discussion now. Mark will
have time and will have changes to the canvas spec. based on
implementations and will be able to bring those changes to the working
group for Canvas 1.

Mark has completed many of the test cases and testing on the test cases I
specified. I am working with him on areas where there is confusion. Mark is
now into the hit region testing and he is working on the scroll testing. He
has been filing bugs on the browser manufacturers. So, a lot of progress
has been made. I envision a quick jump back to last call and then a rapid
pass through CR assuming implementation testing continues to go the way it
has - very well.

It would be nice if there was a way to expedite this round trip like HTML
has done. Is that possible?

Rich



Rich Schwerdtfeger
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 16:21:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:57 UTC