Hi Jo, Thanks for your input... > I think that this is an Addendum to "Mobile Web Best > Practices" and has > little to do with "mobileOK Basic Tests". [Please can you adjust the > title to reflect this] I think this is something that should at least be discussed in a call. It is an important decision that should not be taken lightly. I personally am of a different opinion, which is why I proposed it as is, but can see your point as well. > In my view it is supposed to supplement the "what to test" section of > the Best Practices, e.g. > http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/#d0e981 rather > than http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/#AUTO_REFRESH I think it does that, but it also needs to say a a bit about what to do. As such I still don't see a problem with the document as is. > Afaics there is no relationship at all with the checker so > any reference > to that needs to be removed. Here I have to disagree, but on different grounds. We are not talking about a normative document. We want to help people to create better content. What is the problem with referencing the checker? -- KaiReceived on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 15:06:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 15 October 2008 15:06:51 GMT