W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > October 2007

Content Transformation Problem Statement Document 1e

From: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:46:52 +0100
Message-ID: <C8FFD98530207F40BD8D2CAD608B50B4732F2C@mtldsvr01.DotMobi.local>
To: "BPWG" <member-bpwg@w3.org>, <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Forgive the cross-post while we are in transition to working in public.

I think we are pretty much done on the problem statement [1] and
assuming that members of the CT TF approve this document on Tuesday, I
anticipate that we will request that the full group resolves to publish
it. This needs to happen next Thursday in advance of the impending
publication moratorium.

Jo

[1]
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Probl
emStatement/071002

-----Original Message-----
From: Jo Rabin 
Sent: 03 October 2007 13:47
To: public-bpwg-ct@w3.org
Subject: New version of Problem Statement Document 1e

Hi folks

I apologise for not producing this according to my original estimate but
here it is now.

I am hoping that it is pretty much all but complete. 

The changes in this revision are relatively major, I'd especially
appreciate critical eyes on the restatement of the requirements - to
make sure that everything that was in the previous version is still
there, etc.

The changes are:

Alan Chuter's Comments  -
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0035.html

>From Adam  -
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0034.html

Bryan Sullivan's comments -
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2007Sep/0033.html
(ISSUE-221)

ACTION-565 amplify abstract to make clear that it is a "problem
statement"
ACTION-564 include Magnus's screed on HTTP protocol as part of section
3.
ACTION-563 fold what was section 2 into what was section 1 (now both
become section 2 and an all-new-for-the-Autumn-season section 1 has been
introduced)

You'll find the new version at [1], the previous version is at [2].

Please send comments asap and hopefully we can resolve to publish
Tuesday next week.

Jo

[1]
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Probl
emStatement/071002
[2]
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Probl
emStatement/070911
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 14:47:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:56 UTC