W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Mobile Markup Test

From: Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:43:51 +0300
Message-ID: <fdafd3230706080743m4c7c64f1r2363e2d9b105a2ce@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Herwig Feichtinger" <hf@isdn-capi.de>
Cc: public-bpwg@w3.org
Hi,

The page isn't valid with respect to the XHTML Basic profile. See
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.shamrock.de%2Fpda&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=XHTML+Basic+1.0
for the list of errors.

The second error is not about the img tag, but about the fact that
there is no <h1> element. A "second level heading" should be on the
second level, that's why it is called h2, but you don't have a first
level in your document.


On 6/8/07, Herwig Feichtinger <hf@isdn-capi.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> when validating our mobile page www.shamrock.de/pda with
> http://validator.w3.org/mobile/?uri=www.shamrock.de%2Fpda
> we get the following two errors:
>
> "1. The page is not valid with regard to the XHTML Basic 1.1 DTD."
>
> This surprises me since the page perfectly validates as
> XHTML in the general validator:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.shamrock.de%2Fpda
>
> "2. This test is related to the following Best Practices:
> VALID_MARKUP (techniques): The heading at line 8 column 0 does not
> follow the logical orders of headings levels.
> …<h2 style="color:red"><img src="/pic/min…"
>
> Well, maybe ... should we place <img...> outside of the <h2>...</h2>
> field (though the current structure is perfectly valid HTML)?
>
> Thank you very much,
> Herwig Feichtinger
>
>
>

Sergiu Dumitriu
-- 
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 14:43:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:56 UTC