W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-ct@w3.org > September 2008

[agenda] CT Call Tuesday 23 September 2008

From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:57:06 +0200
Message-ID: <48D741C2.4060904@w3.org>
To: public-bpwg-ct <public-bpwg-ct@w3.org>

Hi CT fans,

On to more Last Call comments resolutions...

Francois.


-----
Chair: François
Staff Contact: François
Known regrets: none

Date: 2008-09-23T1400Z for 60mn
Phone: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152
Conference code: 2283 ("BCTF") followed by # key
IRC channel: #bpwg on irc.w3.org, port 6665.


1. New comments received
-----
- my "no-comment" comment:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2008JulSep/0154.html
- review from the Internet Architecture Board:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2008JulSep/0152.html


2. LC-2018: on the title
-----
ACTION-831 on SeanP
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0009.html and 
replies

Choice between:
- Content Transformation Proxies: Guidelines
- Guidelines for Mobile Web Content Transformation Proxies


3. LC-2025: On the quality and purpose of the doc
-----
ACTION-829 on Heiko
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0004.html and 
reply

Stick to clear concise normative wording but complete with use cases and 
examples?


4. LC-2012: clarification of the introduction
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0015.html


5. LC-2064: duplicated IDs in the document
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0019.html
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: LC-2064 is a mistake. There are no duplicated IDs 
in the document.


6. LC-2003: no mention of whitelists
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0026.html
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: re. LC-2003, stick to our position and use Jo's 
proposed response in public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0026.html


7. LC-2068: on requests that contain Cache-Control: no-transform directives
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0029.html
- any better idea to make it crystal clear that we're just trying to 
emphasize the fact that no-transform may occur in the request as well?


8. LC-2008: on use of Vary header
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0030.html
PROPOSED RESOLUTION: re. LC-2008, update the text according to Jo's 
proposal in public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0030.html


9. LC-2009, LC-2010, LC-2011: the Link element strikes back
-----
See Jo and fd's ping-pong starting at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0027.html


10. HTTPS links re-writing
-----
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Sep/0013.html

The list of comments:
LC-2026
LC-2027
LC-2085
LC-2028
LC-2029
LC-2030
LC-2015
LC-2031
LC-2016
LC-2032
LC-2001
LC-2033
LC-2004
LC-2024


11. AOB
------
Received on Monday, 22 September 2008 06:55:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 06:55:12 GMT