My memory is that you are correct, Francois. Sean > -----Original Message----- > From: public-bpwg-ct-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-ct-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Francois Daoust > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:52 AM > To: public-bpwg-ct > Subject: LC-1995, LC-2037: Missing resolutions > > > Hi guys, > > I'm just checking that this is just a mistake. > > Two resolutions were not taken last week. From my own recollection of > the discussions and from what I see in the minutes, I think that's just > because the scribe forgot to formally take the resolution on IRC. > Am I right? > > The two last call comments and resolutions in question are: > LC-2037: POST retry - 4.1.5.2 Avoiding "Request Unacceptable" Responses > http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-bpwg-minutes.html#item07 > (second proposed resolution) > > LC-1995: About "recent" HTTP "drafts" - Appendix D.2 > http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-bpwg-minutes.html#item32 > > Francois.Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 19:37:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 October 2008 19:37:31 GMT