Re: [ACTION-603] Conversation with Yves, our HTTP expert, about CT and Cache-Control extensions

On Feb 4, 2008 9:59 AM, Sullivan, Bryan <BS3131@att.com> wrote:

> Further, whether a gateway should take HTML (in the presence of a
> no-transform directive) and convert it to WML/WMLC if the browser doesn't
> support HTML, is another question; probably no, but again we're unlikely to
> see any changes in gateways that do act this way.


I disagree that the answer is "probably no" -- we currently do this and we
see lots of mobile usage from WML only devices, and they primarily visit
HTML pages.  I see no reason to stop users from accessing the content they
want.

Aaron