W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: [mobileOK] i18n comment: use of e.g.

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:56:59 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0703210956k52e72a3fped35a2b61b6c9a5f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ishida@w3.org" <ishida@w3.org>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org

Thank you, I have imported all of these comments into our big list of
last call comments.

Sean

On 3/21/07, ishida@w3.org <ishida@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/
>
> Comment 1
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0703-mobileok/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Owner: RI
>
> Location in reviewed document:
> 3.3 CHARACTER_ENCODING_SUPPORT and CHARACTER_ENCODING_USE
>
> Comment:
> [[
> - Content-Type header (e.g. "application/xhtml+xml;charset=UTF-8")
>
> - XML declaration (e.g. "<?xml encoding="UTF-8"?>")
>
> - meta element that is the first child of the document's head element, and whose http-equiv attribute is "Content-Type", and whose content attribute specifies a character encoding as above (e.g. "<metahttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml;charset=UTF-8"/>)
> ]]
>
> Since this test is testing for UTF-8 support, it should be made clearer that the reason 'e.g.' is used rather than 'i.e.' has to do with the other parts of the construct, rather than the encoding declaration itself.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 16:58:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 June 2012 12:13:30 GMT