- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 12:56:59 -0400
- To: "ishida@w3.org" <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Thank you, I have imported all of these comments into our big list of last call comments. Sean On 3/21/07, ishida@w3.org <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/ > > Comment 1 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0703-mobileok/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 3.3 CHARACTER_ENCODING_SUPPORT and CHARACTER_ENCODING_USE > > Comment: > [[ > - Content-Type header (e.g. "application/xhtml+xml;charset=UTF-8") > > - XML declaration (e.g. "<?xml encoding="UTF-8"?>") > > - meta element that is the first child of the document's head element, and whose http-equiv attribute is "Content-Type", and whose content attribute specifies a character encoding as above (e.g. "<metahttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml;charset=UTF-8"/>) > ]] > > Since this test is testing for UTF-8 support, it should be made clearer that the reason 'e.g.' is used rather than 'i.e.' has to do with the other parts of the construct, rather than the encoding declaration itself. > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 16:58:10 UTC