- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:39:53 +0000
- To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/ Comment 1 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0703-mobileok/ Editorial/substantive: E Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 3.3 CHARACTER_ENCODING_SUPPORT and CHARACTER_ENCODING_USE Comment: [[ - Content-Type header (e.g. "application/xhtml+xml;charset=UTF-8") - XML declaration (e.g. "<?xml encoding="UTF-8"?>") - meta element that is the first child of the document's head element, and whose http-equiv attribute is "Content-Type", and whose content attribute specifies a character encoding as above (e.g. "<metahttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml;charset=UTF-8"/>) ]] Since this test is testing for UTF-8 support, it should be made clearer that the reason 'e.g.' is used rather than 'i.e.' has to do with the other parts of the construct, rather than the encoding declaration itself.
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 15:40:26 UTC