W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Last Call on mobileOK Basic Tests [deadline extended!]

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:49:50 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0703122149w3878d6b3w5f39c04cf3c4986c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
I've added these comments to our list of last call comments to be
given a proper review by everyone. These are good points, thank you.

On 3/12/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote:
> Sorry for my last minute response:
> Why I have to use a inputmode attribute, when I send a XHTML/MP 1.0
> page?
> Only when you use XHTML Basic 1.1 (or other Markups that supports the
> inputmode attribute), the attribute should be checked.
> Today, most devices supports XHTML MP and not XHTML Basic 1.1 (still
> a Working Draft).
>        If the document contains any basefont, bdo, center, del, dir,
> font, ins, menu, s, strike or u elements, FAIL
> This is correct, but is this not part of the markup validation?
> If so, why is there no DOCTYPE test?
>       If any element has a style attribute, warn
> Why don't use style attributes on input boxes like:
>    <input type="text" name="number" value="" style="-wap-input-
> format:NN" />
> if you use a special textbox only on a special page?
>       If the document contains a CSS style element but no externally
> linked CSS Style, warn
> Why I should only use externally linked CSS Styles? If I use special
> CSS information on one separate page only,
> why I have to add them in the 'default' or separate  external CSS?
> Cheers,
>   Roland
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 04:50:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC