W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Object parsing

From: <mike@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:14:02 +0000
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1HvDJq-0006LK-0s@wiggum.w3.org>


 Dear Dominique Hazael-Massieux ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the W3C mobileOK Basic
Tests 1.0 published on 30 Jan 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 22 June 2007. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide
a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Michael(tm) Smith
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/1175603203.4535.80.camel@cumulustier
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/


=====

Your comment on 3.15 OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPT (partial):
> Reviewing the test for OBJECT_OR_SCRIPTS in mobileOK basic [1] doesn't
> take into account the nested fallback mechanism allowed by the object
> element.
> 
> It should:
> * explain that the objects can be nested and that the tester needs to
> look into each of the nested object until it find a proper fallback
> * a proper fallback could be an <object> itself and not only an <img>
> or
> some text
> * the object element can contain a number of child elements (<param>
> among others); how does this affect the test :
> "If element body is non-empty and does not consist of text or an img
> element that refers to an image in a supported format"
> (in particular, it's not exactly clear what "element body" means here)


Working Group Resolution:
Yes and appropriate changes will be made to the document to reflect.

----
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 14:14:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC