W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: From Raymond Sonoff --- "RE: Last Call on mobileOK Basic Tests [deadline extended!]"

From: <mike@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:13:59 +0000
To: Raymond Sonoff <subscriber@sonoffconsulting.com>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1HvDJn-0006Kf-07@wiggum.w3.org>


 Dear Raymond Sonoff ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the W3C mobileOK Basic
Tests 1.0 published on 30 Jan 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 22 June 2007. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide
a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Michael(tm) Smith
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/009d01c7659e$60a0fd70$6101a8c0@sonoffe1505
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/


=====

Your comment on 3.16 PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT:
> 1. Increase the Page Limits from 10K for markup to at least 20K
> (preferably
> 40K), along with a commensurate increase for the total Page Limit to
> at
> least 40K.
> 
> 1. I wish to provide more than a token amount of content to anyone who
> accesses any Web site that I develop, refine, and make available to
> visitors, users, clients, prospects, or customers to those Web sites.
> Providing alternative text, title text, and wanting to offer two
> Cascading
> Style Sheets (one for the screen; the second, for print-related
> operations
> -- as are currently exemplified for all Web pages in the
> sonoffconsulting.com domain), the current upper limits are overly
> restrictive and something has to be sacrificed (unnecessarily, I feel)
> to
> pass that test element. QUESTION: Why not allow for the multi-CSS
> stylesheets to allow for "intelligent word-wrapped" printing as a Web
> Best
> Practice for everyone to incorporate into their Web site designs?


Working Group Resolution:
Stylesheets that are not targeted at mobile are not included in the total
byte count. We will clarify the text at 2.3.5 and 2.36 to this effect.  In
respect of the upper limit of 10KB, this applies only to the DDC, if you
are delivering to non-mobile devices then a higher limit may be
appropriate.

----
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 14:14:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC