RE: Editorial issues with PR-mobile-bp-20061102

Sorry, I don't mean to prolong this exchange but I just realised that where
I said: "it's probably best to keep your comments" it would have been
clearer if I had said "we will keep your comments".

Thanks
Jo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-bpwg-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-bpwg-comments-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Johannes Koch
> Sent: 13 November 2006 10:32
> To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Editorial issues with PR-mobile-bp-20061102
> 
> 
> Hi Jo
> 
> Jo Rabin schrieb:
> > Since the document is now in its final phase it's probably best to keep
> your
> > comments for when a new version of the document is produced and see if
> it
> > can't be done better at that point.
> 
> OK. Sorry for not commenting earlier.
> 
> > A further public draft of MobileOK will be released very soon.
> 
> Yes, I saw that.
> --
> Johannes Koch
> In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
>                              (Te Deum, 4th cent.)