W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: [CAPABILTIES] wording suggestion

From: <dom@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:05:09 +0000 (GMT)
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060412170509.832096638A@dolph.w3.org>

[Sorry for the duplicate]

  Dear Charles McCathieNevile ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s490dlpcwxe0ny@pc090.coreteam.oslo.opera.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on [STRUCTURE] Ensure t...:


Rather than the negative "Do not take a least common denominator  
approach", this could be better phrased as "... to maximise usability" or 

something similar. It needs to be clear that while thispractise does  
authorise sending enhanced content to users who are clearly able to make  
use of it, it does not authorise breaking the "one web" principle and  
simply ignoring users (provided they have at least a "baseline-capable"  
device).

cheers

Chaals


Working Group Resolution:
Under what it means, it says:



"While encouraging content providers to be sensitive to the needs of the
default delivery context, it is not intended that this results in a
diminished experience on more capable devices. Specifically it is not the
intention to encourage the development of sites that target the default
delivery context when a better user experience could be attained on more
capable devices."



which makes it clear that baseline devices should not be forgotten.

----
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:14:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:50 UTC