Sunday, 21 May 2006
Thursday, 18 May 2006
- Re: Comments on 12 Apr 2006 MWI BP [Was: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft)
- Re: Problem with capabilities guideline (5.1.2)
- Re: Comments on 12 Apr 2006 MWI BP [Was: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft)
- Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Future techniques
- Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 Introduction - history sensitive
- Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Scope
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links
- RE: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Support Unicode
- Re: [MWBP] let's fix WAI linking
- Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Image Format
Thursday, 4 May 2006
- RE: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Support Unicode
- RE: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Working with multiple languages
Wednesday, 3 May 2006
Monday, 1 May 2006
- Re: [IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE] - CSS, SVG
- Re: [MEASURES] - borders, margins?
- Re: [CONTEXT] not a requirement
- Re: [TAB_ORDER] - testing
- Re: [CAPABILTIES] wording suggestion
- Re: [OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPTS]
Saturday, 29 April 2006
Wednesday, 26 April 2006
- comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Image Format
- comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Future techniques
- comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Scope
- comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 Introduction - history sensitive
Tuesday, 25 April 2006
Monday, 24 April 2006
Thursday, 20 April 2006
Sunday, 16 April 2006
- Re: [STRUCTURE] - alternative wording?
- Re: Missing points in current last call draft
- Re: [TABLES_LAYOUT] - another machine test
Wednesday, 12 April 2006
- Re: [CONTEXT] not a requirement
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: No mention of metacharset
- Re: Collected WAI comments on the Mobile Web Best Practices Last Call
- Re: Comments on Draft 13 January 2006
- Re: Missing points in current last call draft
- Re: [TAB_ORDER] - testing
- Re: [CAPABILTIES] wording suggestion
- Re: [OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPTS]
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Resources for translatingcontent
- Re: [IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE] - CSS, SVG
- Re: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft)
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Language declaration
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: References in the text / in thereference list
- Re: [TABLES_LAYOUT] - another machine test
- Re: [CONTEXT] is unnecessary
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Support Unicode
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Mention standard messages in a mobile device
- Re: Comments on the Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 (W3C Working Draft 13 January 2006) document
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Line break correction
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Input methods
- Re: [STRUCTURE] - alternative wording?
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: HTTP charset reference
- Re: 1.4 delivery context
- Re: 5.3.7 background image support
- Re: [MEASURES] - borders, margins?
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: No normative references?
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Relation between sec. 4.2 andactual best practice statements
- Re: Re:Comments on Draft 13 January 2006
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Developing countries and i18n/l10nrequirements
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Machine test
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Localization part of usability
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Reference to UAProf
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: I18n in the scope of MWBP
- Re: ANEC comments on MWBP (Last Call version 1.0 of January 13, 2006)
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Section 1.6
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Bandwith / cost related toscripts
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: XHTML basic
- Re: [Fwd: FW: Nokia comments on MWI BP LC draft]
- Re: "find out capabilities" best practice works against "One Web" message
- Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Working with multiple languages