Re: Update Regarding Review of W3C Papers

Dear all,

> * We are asking all Program Committee members to rate the papers and expressions of interest on suitability of the topic to be one of the planned lightning talks and other presentations or focus areas for the event.
> * Please use this form to rate the papers:
> http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1
> * We have decided to extend the deadline for review of the papers until end of Monday, June 13th.

I have completed my review except PC submissons.

Best Regards,
Shigeru Fujimura (NTT Corporation)


On 2016/06/11 3:37, Dazza Greenwood wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on the discussion so far, here are a couple updates on the position
> paper reviews:
>
> * We are asking all Program Committee members to rate the papers and
> expressions of interest on suitability of the topic to be one of the
> planned lightning talks and other presentations or focus areas for the
> event.
> * Please use this form to rate the papers:
> http://goo.gl/forms/5SJwDSQ7f9ghwW7t1
> * We have decided to extend the deadline for review of the papers until end
> of Monday, June 13th.
>
> Thanks,
>  - Dazza
>
>
>    ________________________
>    |   Daniel "Dazza" Greenwood <http://dazzagreenwood.com/>
>    |   CIVICS.com <http://civics.com/> & Law.MIT.edu <http://law.mit.edu/>
>    |   dazza@CIVICS.com & 617.500.3644
>    |   Box 425845, Cambridge, MA 02142
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Neha Narula <narula@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's time to start reviewing.  We are doing this in a fairly informal,
>> public way.  The list of position statements and expressions of interest,
>> with links, is here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1n6_TKB3idRR1SJnRA43Euce_P8blPezA3FL7nDxpx8I/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> We have more requests to attend than we have space, so we need to
>> thoughtfully consider who to invite to attend.  Here are the criteria we
>> are using:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/blockchain/blob/master/position-papers.md#review-criteria
>>
>> *Please rate as many as you are able to reasonably read and review, with
>> the aim of spreading out reviews to cover all of the submissions. *
>>
>> You can rank each submission on a scale of 1-5, where 1=strong reject,
>> 2=weak reject, 3=neutral, 4=weak accept, and 5=strong accept.  Enter your
>> numerical score in the appropriate cell of the spreadsheet, and if you have
>> review comments, enter those as a comment on the cell.
>>
>> We will average the reviews and sort them, taking as many as we can going
>> down the list, depending on capacity.
>>
>> Please prioritize the non-PC submissions.  I have separated out the PC
>> submissions at the bottom.
>>
>> Everyone is using the same spreadsheet; mistakes are inevitable, but
>> Command(Control)-Z is your friend (Edit->Undo).  That's the beauty of
>> operational transforms!
>>
>> *Please get this done by EOD Sunday *so that we can send out invitations
>> on Monday.  It is already very late in the game to send out invites.
>>
>> If you are totally Google-averse and don't have an account send me an
>> email and we'll work something out.
>>
>> Note:  If you have not contributed thus far, not submitted anything, and
>> don't do any reviews, I might move to kick you off the PC :)
>>
>> --
>> http://nehanaru.la | @neha
>>
>

-- 
******************
Shigeru FUJIMURA
NTT Service Evolution Laboratories
TEL: 046-859-3367
MAIL TO: fujimura.shigeru@lab.ntt.co.jp

Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2016 05:04:57 UTC