Re: RDF Concepts and fragids

Not normative

-Alan

On Apr 1, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote:

> Poking around the blogosphere I came across this:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-fragID
> 
> which seems to contradict 3986 and webarch.  According to this text,
> if I have id="foo" in an XML document (not rdf+xml) at
> http://example/x, then http://example/x does NOT refer to that XML
> element, as it would according to 3986 and webarch.
> 
> Worse, if there's RDF at that URI published as Turtle, then the Turtle
> can't specify the meaning of a fragid, because Concepts says that
> RDF/XML semantics applies.
> 
> What a rathole!
> 
> Nathan, I trust you'll be fixing this. Somehow. :)
> 
> Jonathan
>