public-awwsw@w3.org from February 2010 by thread

AWWSW telecon Tues 2010-03-02 Jonathan Rees (Friday, 26 February)

about REST Jonathan Rees (Friday, 26 February)

• Re: about REST Dan Connolly (Friday, 26 February)
  • Re: about REST Jonathan Rees (Friday, 26 February)
• Re: about REST Jonathan Rees (Saturday, 27 February)
  • Re: about REST Alan Ruttenberg (Sunday, 28 February)

example of has-information != says Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 18 February)

• Re: example of has-information != says Dan Connolly (Thursday, 18 February)

Minutes from today's call 16-Feb-2009 David Booth (Tuesday, 16 February)

ISSUE-3: Definitions of HTTP semantics (near "information resource" / 200 responses) sufficient to satisfy OBO designers, who are avoiding 200 W3C Architecture of The World Wide Semantic Web Task Force Issue Tracker (Tuesday, 16 February)

telecon today will use my bridge David Booth (Tuesday, 16 February)

telecon 2/16 Jonathan Rees (Monday, 15 February)

AWWSW action 23 David Booth (Tuesday, 2 February)

• Re: AWWSW action 23 David Booth (Wednesday, 3 February)

Re: AWWSW telecon, Tue 2010-02-02 David Booth (Tuesday, 2 February)

More comments on draft report David Booth (Tuesday, 2 February)

• Re: More comments on draft report David Booth (Tuesday, 2 February)
  • Semantics of 301 [was Re: More comments on draft report] David Booth (Tuesday, 16 February)
    • Re: Semantics of 301 [was Re: More comments on draft report] Jonathan Rees (Wednesday, 17 February)
      • Re: Semantics of 301 [was Re: More comments on draft report] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 17 February)
        • Re: Semantics of 301 [was Re: More comments on draft report] Jonathan Rees (Thursday, 18 February)

Last message date: Sunday, 28 February 2010 14:57:42 UTC