W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > January 2009

AWWSW telecon, Tues Feb 3

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:15:06 -0500
Message-Id: <17113815-C20C-48CF-994C-E86F0A57C2B6@creativecommons.org>
To: public-awwsw@w3.org

Agenda as below. More use cases please -- or be prepared to declare  
is no more semantics to be squeezed out of RFC 2616 and we should move  
to another regime such as REST (i.e. what you want
to impute to the sender if you're willing to believe they're using  
that regime).

If you've forgotten what this is about see the top of http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswVocabulary

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Date: January 17, 2009 9:34:32 AM EST
> To: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
> Subject: AWWSW telecon, Tues Jan 20
> Agenda is continuing as before...  but I really really would like to
> find another use case where we can determine through formal (or less
> desirably, informal) reasoning that an HTTP response says something
> that is not true (or contradicts other intelligence). Ontology
> building has to combine speculation with application, and we've been a
> bit heavy on the speculation.
> Jonathan
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 18:15:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:07 UTC