Re: httpRange-14 erratum

FWIW, there were still problems (in my view) with the cool uris paper.
(I have to dig through mail archives to pull back the issues)
-Alan

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
<skw@hp.com> wrote:
> Re TAG finding:
>
>  - there was[1];
>  - it wasn't going well;
>  - the CoolUri's paper [2] was covering similar ground (and IMO was more coherent);
>
> ... so we abandoned it if favour of helping get the CoolUri's paper done.
>
> Backtrack through earlier versions of [1] and you'll probably understand why we set it asside :-)
>
> Stuart
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/HttpRange-14.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris
> --
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-awwsw-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:public-awwsw-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rees
>> Sent: 23 November 2008 04:07
>> To: Alan Ruttenberg
>> Cc: public-awwsw@w3.org
>> Subject: httpRange-14 erratum
>>
>>
>> I finally got around to adding my erratum about "is an
>> information resource" to
>>
>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/ErrataHttpRange14
>>
>> I also added a comment that there's a TAG finding in progress that's
>> relevant. I forget what it's called; perhaps Noah or Stuart can
>> refresh my memory.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 16:53:11 UTC