W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Call for agenda for 11/25 telecon

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:46:32 +0000
Message-ID: <49270208.9070803@ibiblio.org>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Cc: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>, Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, valentina presutti <vpresutti@gmail.com>

I'm in DERI for a Voccamp, but I think I can make this next telecon if
DERI gives me access to a telephone.

For discussion, I think inspecting a draft ontology and trying to align
it with our present list of terms  (I'm still working on my
idiosyncratic one) and TimBL's vocabulary. The best draft ontology for
this I know of was made by Valentina Presutti and Aldo Gangemi. Shall we
devote an agenda item to discuss their ontology?

Their ontology is given in "A grounded ontology for identity and
reference of web resources" here [1].

[1] http://www2007.org/workshops/paper_71.pdf

       take care,

More below:
Jonathan Rees wrote:
> I can keep plugging away but I'm feeling a bit lonely.
> If we're going to make progress someone has to put in a bit of effort.
> I'm sorry I haven't had as much time to work on AWWSW as I had
> expected but a large urgent project fell into my lap in October and
> I'm struggling to keep from drowning.
> What can each of you do before the next meeting and what would you
> like to talk about?
I'd like to get a review of HTTP in RDF out, and I'm *almost* down with
my own take on Web arch and list of terms (which, I'm warning you,
currently is about 150 pages!)
> After 11/25 our next scheduled time would be 12/9, which falls during
> the TAG face to face, so that is a conflict for some of us. With 12/23
> dangerously close to the holiday season, our 11/25 meeting is at risk
> of being the last of 2008. Would anyone care to have an extra telecon
> scheduled for a between-week?
That might be necessary, and I'm OK.
> At the TAG F2F I may be asked to report back on the AWWSW activity, by
> the way, so the next two weeks would be an excellent time to get
> something accomplished.
I think if we can align the terms with Presutti and Gangemi's ontology
and get a review of HTTP in RDF out, we've made considerable progress.
> Jonathan
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 18:47:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:06 UTC