Re: Updating Maintenance type

I agree also with Justin's remarks.

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:02 AM, 박종선(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Could you please review the link below?
> https://rawgithub.com/w3c/automotive-bg/master/draft_specs/VehicleAPI_Maintenance.htm
> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/commit/4427639092009e7f31e7969f07bb5134747a77f1 (diff)
>
> I've updated your work a little bit according to the Kevron's common interfaces.
> I didn't delete your 'Issue' section yet. Here are my quick answers.
>
> Issue1) Grouping
> It makes sense.
>
> Issue2) distanceSinceStart
> I vote to keep it. But I prefers to separate it from tripmeter.
>
> Issue3) TransmissionOil temperature, wear.
> I vote to keep it. I'm sure it's real.
>
> Issue4) TransmissionClutch wear
> I vote to keep it. It seems real.
>
> Issue5) Tire Pressure Low
> It's a kind of high level wrapper for who wants to know just whether it's ok or not rather than exact pressure value.
>
> Issue6) tirePressureThresholdFrontAxle and tirePressureThresholdRearAxle
> Issue7) wheelSpeedWarningIndication
> I agreed on removing those.
>
> You noted most of interfaces as optional.
> I totally agreed that those are optional, but not sure that we need to note 'optional' explicitly.
> Because W3C specifications seem not to note it.
>
> Please review and give comments.
>
> Regards,
> Justin
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Justin(Jong-Seon) Park
> WMT Team, S/W Platform Lab.,
> LG Electronics Inc.
> 221 YangJae-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 137-130, Korea
>
> Phone : +82-2-526-4183
> Fax   : +82-2-6912-6358
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 21:57:58 UTC