W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 23037] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:05:08 +0000
To: public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23037-5429-Z1dOtoxF4D@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23037

--- Comment #4 from paul@paul.cx <padenot@mozilla.com> ---
Right.

For what it's worth, in case of loop without at least a one block delay, Pd
refuses to starts the processing ("error: DSP loop detected"), and Max mutes
the subgraph containing the cycle, but does not log an error.

Reading the 2012-09-12 minutes, we still have to agree on whether we want to
clamp in ms or block. I'd say that one block is better.

Either way, we could warn the author in the console (maybe only the first time
it occurs), that his value has been clamped.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 11:05:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:10 UTC