W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2013

[Bug 23037] What should happen in case of cycles containing a delay node is under-defined

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:42:09 +0000
To: public-audio@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-23037-5429-z91G4pjUyt@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23037

--- Comment #3 from Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla) <roc@ocallahan.org> ---
We actually resolved about a year ago to clamp to a minimum delay:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JulSep/0768.html
Making the minimum delay be one block was really the only viable option.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 10:42:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:10 UTC