W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2013

[Minutes] Audio WG teleconference, 14th March 2013

From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:36:36 +0000
To: "public-audio@w3.org WG" <public-audio@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FF9DD7E4-81C0-42B3-BBF5-3023B6B10EA4@bbc.co.uk>
Dear all,

The minutes of the "last teleconference of the year" - or rather the last teleconference before our San Francisco face-to-face, are available at:

We discussed:

* OfflineAudioContext / Memory footprint

Continuing the discussion from the thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013JanMar/thread.html#msg395 - Chris Rogers explained the issue in more detail. We did not reach a conclusion but will be tracking the issue in Bugzilla (Joe to create the entry)

* F2f and testing

We looked at the draft agenda and had a good discussion on testing and how we'd like to use the f2f to get everyone some hands-one experience in writing tests. We also integrated some suggestions on walking the group through the web audio spec (please have a read/refresh shortly before the f2f!) and fixing small issues as we go along. The resulting agenda is at http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/F2F_Mar_2013

* The issue of ScriptProcessorNode not being an EventTarget
There was agreement that the suggestion made by Dominic (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013JanMar/0387.html) was a good solution to the ScriptProcessorNode EventTarget/Callback issue - https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20764
There was also a discussion on how we want to manage submissions or push for patches to the spec. For people who have a specific command of parts of the spec (e.g Ehsan with the IDL and other bits) we agreed that they should feel free to push simple patches to the repository directly, but that we wanted to have discussions and submitted/reviewed patches for anything significant/controversial. The practice of discussing/agreeing on an issue before making a change to the spec should, obviously, continue.

Next meeting: f2f in SFO, 26-27 March


This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2013 17:37:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:07 UTC