On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:06 AM, olivier Thereaux > <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi Ehsan, >> >> I think you should go ahead. >> >> At this point it doesn't look like the web audio API's exceptions are very >> useful/well defined anyway (See e.g. >> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17325) and if indeed "raises" >> has been removed from webIDL, we should remove our instances of it. >> >> Olivier > > > Thanks Ehsan, I agree we should make the spec Web IDL compatible. > Otherwise, concerning the exceptions, I plan to upgrade the spec to address > issues raised in 17325. Cool, I have removed 'raises' notations from the spec. -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 19:38:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 August 2012 19:38:36 GMT