W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Removing the "raises" IDL notations from the spec

From: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:09:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+EzO0kL+c6OobEkudL7QR1X7vA-rQa6uQr1O77ufju_pMWJ2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>, public-audio@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:06 AM, olivier Thereaux <
olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Ehsan,
>
> I think you should go ahead.
>
> At this point it doesn't look like the web audio API's exceptions are very
> useful/well defined anyway (See e.g.
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17325) and if indeed
> "raises" has been removed from webIDL, we should remove our instances of it.
>
> Olivier
>

Thanks Ehsan, I agree we should make the spec Web IDL compatible.
 Otherwise, concerning the exceptions, I plan to upgrade the spec to
address issues raised in
17325<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17325>
.

Chris



>
>
> On 16 Aug 2012, at 03:32, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have started to modify the IDL syntax used in the Web Audio spec to
> > be Web IDL compatible.
> >
> > The existing spec uses the "raises" syntax to denote what types of
> > exceptions a given method may throw in a lot of places.  The raises
> > clause has been removed from Web IDL as of September last year, so I'm
> > planning on removing that notation, but I'd like to check here first
> > to make sure nobody objects to this change.  Please let me know if you
> > have concerns about this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Ehsan
> > <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>
> >
>
>
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 19:10:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 16 August 2012 19:10:13 GMT