W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Proposed UC - metronome and instrument tuner

From: Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:23:25 -0400
Cc: public-audio@w3.org
Message-Id: <ED7501BB-1AEF-42E7-B127-03DB5F585244@noteflight.com>
To: Chris Lowis <chris.lowis@bbc.co.uk>
The important thing about the metronome UC is with respect to recording and audio acquisition, as Olivier points out, not sound generation.  It becomes important to be able to correlate the timing of audio input with respect to the timing of audio output at a sample-accurate level.  I did not look at the UC yet but if it can include audio recording/analysis of someone playing along with the generated metronome, then this will make it a distinct and useful UC.


On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Chris Lowis wrote:

> On 23/02/2012 10:30, Thierry MICHEL wrote:
>> Olivier,
>> I am not sure these 2 UC can merge in the current UC-13.
>> maybe people have thoughts ?
> 
> I think the only requirement revealed by the metronome use-case is around sample-accurate scheduled triggering of events. I think this is already covered by UC5. I can't see what other requirements the metronome use-case drives out. Did you have anything else is mind, Thierry?
> 
> If that is the case, perhaps it's better to drop it entirely, rather than add unnecessary words to the existing use cases? Keeping the use-case descriptions short and readable helps with getting more people to review them, I think.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris
> 

... .  .    .       Joe

Joe Berkovitz
President

Noteflight LLC
84 Hamilton St, Cambridge, MA 02139
phone: +1 978 314 6271
www.noteflight.com
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 15:24:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 March 2012 15:24:01 GMT