W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Web Workers

From: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:33:26 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+EzO0mjgzLBqH6BZQ08R9ofLya98o+qPcryuTj7=CzHvo5qUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com>
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <rocallahan@gmail.com>, public-audio@w3.org
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Alistair MacDonald <al@signedon.com> wrote:

> Hi Chris R., ROC,
>
> A some questions as I am working on the Spec Differences documentation:
>
>
> ROC, I noticed I could not get access to audio data with the MediaStreams
> API without using a Worker thread (using your recent builds and demos).
> Jussi said he believes this the case too. Could you confirm this? If so -
> is this by-design? I am trying to figure out whether there is a technical
> suggestion of dropping JavaScript Processing of audio data from the
> main-thread all-together, or is this was merely a matter of tackling the
> Worker code as a priority.
>
>
> Chris R., Where do we currently stand with Workers and the WebAudio API?
> It looks like there has been a lot of great detail going in at the design
> level, do we have an implementation that can use Workers yet? (Apologies if
> there already is and I've missed it)
>

There is not yet an audio workers implementation in WebKit, but please
follow this thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0245.html

I hope this thread creates some more discussion.


>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Alistair MacDonald
> SignedOn, Inc - W3C Audio WG
> Boston, MA, (707) 701-3730
> al@signedon.com - http://signedon.com
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 18:33:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 February 2012 18:34:01 GMT