W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: MIDI enumeration (was: Re: getUserMedia use cases)

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:14:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqUimAydsNv-MR5UNDhLVVO8RDRcD_sfH-AsKfWYM4W6wA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tom White (MMA)" <lists@midi.org>
Cc: Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-audio@w3.org, Dom Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com
Oh, I had been.  The Windows APIs have a bit more to them in some cases
(like enumeration), which is why I was poking at if those bits were
interesting in use or not...

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Tom White (MMA) <lists@midi.org> wrote:

> **
> >> Note I'm borrowing these concepts from the Windows MIDI API, e.g.
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd798467(v=vs.85).aspx
> . <<
>
> No offense intended to Microsoft, but when it comes to MIDI support, Apple
> is generally considered (by those who know) to be a better example of "how
> it should be done"... which is not to say there is anything specifically
> wrong with these Microsoft concepts, only that it's a little weird to think
> of them as exemplary <g>. I would simply suggest looking at Apple's API,
> too...
>
> Tom White
> MMA
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 21:15:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 February 2012 21:15:25 GMT