W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Using Bugzilla

From: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:50:37 +0100
Cc: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Message-Id: <EBAD624A-88B4-42E2-AA7F-C4BD2E851CA8@bbc.co.uk>
To: Audio Working Group <public-audio@w3.org>
One word about issues/bug statuses.

Here are the equivalent statuses between the two tools:

Tracker -> Bugzilla
==================
Raised -> New
Open -> Assigned or Reopened
Pending Review -> Resolved
Closed -> Closed

Chris, I have set the web audio API bugs which were "Pending Review" as "Reopened" for the time being. As soon as you have created your account I will switch them to the proper status.

All: apologies for the many Bugzilla messages. It should be steady from now on, and we should get a convenient email copy of all issues discussed on the web tool  - something tracker didn't give us.


Cheers,
Olivier

On 5 Jun 2012, at 17:22, olivier Thereaux wrote:

> Hi group,
> 
> As you have seen in a recent series of e-mails, we have migrated all our working group's issues to the public instance of w3c's bug tracker:
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/describecomponents.cgi?product=AudioWG
> 
> Bugzilla has a bit of a learning curve, but will offer us a more powerful platform for discussion of issues, assignment of work, and documentation of resolution.
> 
> In an effort to make the transition as clean as possible, I suggest we all start using bugzilla to track and discuss our current list of issues. Is there any objection to use bugzilla exclusively from now on, for the sake of clarity?
> 
> Can everyone make sure to create an account on the bugzilla if you don't yet have one? That is particularly important for the editors of our specs, to whom the "bugs" will be assigned when they work on a resolution.
> 
> Thanks,
> Olivier
> 



Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:53:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:53:23 GMT