W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Web Audio API spec review

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:56:22 +0300
Message-ID: <4FB26E96.1010602@helsinki.fi>
To: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
CC: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
On 05/15/2012 04:14 PM, Olivier Thereaux wrote:
> Hi Olli,
>
> On 15/05/2012 14:51, Olli Pettay wrote:
>> That is sad given the technical merits the MediaStream Processing API has.
>> I don't know why the WG ended up to such resolution.
>
> For the record, there was never any doubt that the MediaStream Processing API had technical merits and a number of excellent ideas, which is why we
> will keep using it as a basis for our work after publishing it as a Note.
>
> You may get an idea of the discussions leading to the resolution here:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/02-audio-minutes.html#item07
> then here:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/09-audio-minutes.html#item01
>
> In a nutshell: the group decided to focus on building upon the spec proposal which was getting the clearest traction from the industry,

This is the part I'm not really aware of. What industry and why? Is the reason that
the Web Audio API has been implemented for longer time?


> while
> acknowledging and benefiting from the value of the other.
>
> Thanks,
> Olivier
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 14:57:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 May 2012 14:57:25 GMT