W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria-editors@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Draft approach to split ARIA repository

From: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:11:22 +0200
Message-Id: <3FD8296C-09A6-4776-A30E-2625C02F6FEF@agosto.nl>
To: ARIA Editors <public-aria-editors@w3.org>
> For references to things in the common repository or other repositories, such as scripts and images or links to sections of other specs, I'm inclined to suggest we use relative links. They just have to point one directory higher than they used to. For me, this makes things easier when working offline, but requires having local clones of any other repository you need to reference, and assumes the clones are at sibling directory levels to each other. Some may say absolute links are preferred though, so we may need to debate pros / cons of both approaches.

I’d prefer absolute paths because I despise nested repositories.

Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 15:11:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 6 May 2016 15:11:50 UTC