- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:55:27 -0400
- To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>, ARIA Working Group Admin <public-aria-admin@w3.org>
Hi John. I mainly am questioning if we want it to be a warning, rather than a more normative statement. Granted the problem with a normative statement is that it's hard to test that the authors have done it. --joanie On 06/03/2016 09:18 AM, John Foliot wrote: > Hi Michiel, > > Thanks. To echo Michael, if there are any proposed edits to the current > draft text, let's see them now so that the group can make a final > decision - my sense yesterday on the call was that most folks were happy > with what we had, but if we need to fine-tune it let's do so before the > weekend (if possible), as this CfC closes in 5 days. > > Cheers! > > JF > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl > <mailto:michiel@agosto.nl>> wrote: > > John, > > It was actually Joanie that said she wanted to make some edits > yesterday on IRC. I have copied her in. I have asked our internal > language specialist to have a look at it too. > > —Michiel > >> On 03 Jun 2016, at 01:57, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com >> <mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>> wrote: >> >> +1 to Michael. >> >> This is the current proposed draft. If you believe it can be >> improved, I for one welcome the submission and am amiable to >> consider it. What were you thinking Michiel? >> >> My goal is to get it as good as we can without impeding progress. >> >> JF >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org >> <mailto:cooper@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> Word smithing is often editorial, but not always. If you see a >> potential need for it, it would be helpful to make your >> suggestion now so people can consider it as they review this >> CfC and can decide if they want to comment in favor or against >> it. If people do not comment or appear to strongly favor one >> or the other, and it seems clearly editorial, then we can >> leave it to chair / editors to decide what to do with it when >> ratifiying the CfC. >> >> Because it's potentially technical, I suggest word-smithing be >> copied to the main WG list, not just the admin list. >> >> (My goal here is to suggest a way for "friendly amendments" to >> be considered without requiring a new consensus call or >> invalidating the original one if the amendment draws concern >> or proves not editorial.) >> >> Michael >> >> >> On 02/06/2016 6:25 PM, Michiel Bijl wrote: >>> +1 to this warning. It might need some word smithing, but that would be editorial no? >>> >>> —Michiel >>> >>>> On 02 Jun 2016, at 23:22, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> >>>> <mailto:cooper@w3.org> wrote: This is a Call for Consensus >>>> (CfC) to the Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) >>>> Working Group regarding the following resolution of the ARIA >>>> Working group: Accept John's suggested warning text for the >>>> password role Background This was approved by the >>>> participants of the 2 June 2016 teleconference, and further >>>> context is available in the minutes: >>>> https://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-aria-minutes.html#item04 <https://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-aria-minutes.html#item04> >>>> <https://www.w3.org/2016/06/02-aria-minutes.html#item04>If >>>> this CfC is accepted, the following pull request will be >>>> merged: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/396 <https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/396> >>>> <https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/396> >>>> Action >>>> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages of support are certainly welcome. >>>> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please respond by replying on list to this message no later than 23:59 (midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday, 8 June 2016. For objections only, please copy the main aria@w3.org <mailto:aria@w3.org> <mailto:aria@w3.org> <mailto:aria@w3.org> list to allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there. >>>> Process >>>> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy: >>>> >>>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy <https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy> >>>> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy>I am issuing >>>> this CfC as acting chair, but Rich will record the formal >>>> ratification if passed. Michael >> >> >> >> >> -- >> John Foliot >> Principal Accessibility Consultant >> Deque Systems Inc. >> john.foliot@deque.com <mailto:john.foliot@deque.com> >> >> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion >> >> >> >> -- >> John Foliot >> Principal Accessibility Consultant >> Deque Systems Inc. >> john.foliot@deque.com <mailto:john.foliot@deque.com> >> >> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion > > > > > -- > John Foliot > Principal Accessibility Consultant > Deque Systems Inc. > john.foliot@deque.com <mailto:john.foliot@deque.com> > > Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Friday, 3 June 2016 14:56:24 UTC