W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-argumentation@w3.org > December 2012

RE: Argumentation and RDFa

From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 23:12:49 +0000
Message-ID: <SNT002-W509B54925EFAA9A8993058C53C0@phx.gbl>
To: "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
CC: "tehom@panix.com" <tehom@panix.com>

Argumentation Community Group,
Tom Breton,

Greetings.  That's an excellent question.  We can review each existing argumentation interchange and representation format and consider, for a set of use cases, which features or expressiveness that any new formats or ontologies might require.



Kind regards,

Adam Sobieski

Received on Monday, 31 December 2012 23:13:16 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: Tom Breton (Tehom): "Re: Argumentation and RDFa"
In reply to: Tom Breton (Tehom): "Re: Argumentation and RDFa"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 December 2012 23:13:16 GMT