W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-argumentation@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Argumentation and RDFa

From: Tom Breton (Tehom) <tehom@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:17:49 -0500
Message-ID: <486171d0efa49e6f49f6b4b3da1c8263.squirrel@mail.panix.com>
Cc: "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
> Argumentation models and formats can facilitate new features for hypertext
> documents, digital books and digital textbooks containing conversational,
> mathematical, scientific, legal, and political argumentation.
> Machine-utilizable argumentation structures can be added to documents with
> RDFa (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/,
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-in-html/) and argumentation interchange and
> representation formats
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-argumentation/2012May/0001.html).

Which existing argumentation representation formats are suitable for
annotating general-purpose hypertext documents?

Last I looked, none seemed capable of that.

	Tom Breton (Tehom)
Received on Monday, 31 December 2012 22:18:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 December 2012 22:18:10 GMT