Re: Updated Schema Architypes Straw Man Proposal

> On 18 May 2017, at 10:34, Jane Stevenson <Jane.Stevenson@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> 4. However I concur that in such a case in practice it probably would not be practical to list all 500 in the JSON-LD insert on the collection page.   In such a case however use of isPartOf In the description of the ArchiveItem would be sufficient to assert the relationship to a search engine: 
>> “isPartOf”: “https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407/thm/407/8 <https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407/thm/407/8>” (JSON-LD syntax)
> 
> Yes, that’s exactly my thinking. 
> 
> But it would be “isPartOf”: “https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407/thm/407 <https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407/thm/407>” (is part of the Ronnie Barker Collection

Trying to get this straight in my mind - would you describe the specific Item (https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407/thm/407/8/3) as being part of:

a) the ‘sub-collection’ (https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407/thm/407/8)
b) the archive collection (https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb71-thm/407) 
c) both

?

Owen