Ian Hickson: > So I did some research, and ECMA 262 does have getters and setters. They > just haven't actually made it all the way through ECMA's standardisation > process yet. I've added a link to drafts of ECMA262-4 to the spec. I've > also clarified that while the examples use getters and setters, this > doesn't imply that they must be supported (or indeed that JS at all must > be supported, in any version). Ok, thanks. > We need getters and setters for XBL2, otherwise we can't do attributes, > which is a rather critical requirement. I don't really have a better > suggestion. I agree that getters and setters make for much nicer implementation objects. -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:heycam@jabber.org ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN cam@mcc.id.auReceived on Saturday, 13 January 2007 05:47:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT