On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > The document is currently (understandably) biased towards ECMAScript. > Some parts however, such as section 5.4, are described only in terms of > how ECMAScript is supported. There should be language in there to guide > implementors on how to support other scripting languages (for example on > how the public/private implementation objects should look in general). It really depends on the language. I don't see how generic text could be written. Do you have any suggestions? If any other languages were to be used, they'd need a spec first anyway to ensure interoperability, so I'm not sure that it would help to have suggestive text. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 01:59:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:21 GMT