Re: [ac] Updates to Access-Control document

There's informal, unofficial activity (disclaimer: I'm one of the  
instigators) on the HTTP WG list to revise RFC2616, but the stated  
intent is to get a WG and make it formal. See:
   <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/>

Cheers,


On 2007/02/15, at 9:53 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:12:36 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo- 
> inc.com> wrote:
>> Can you change to ABNF? If the HTTP changes go through, it's  
>> likely to be to ABNF, not EBNF, since that's the IETF's preferred  
>> flavour.
>
> What do you mean with "If the HTTP changes go through [...]"?
>
>
> -- 
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com